Efforts within Congress and U.S. agencies seek to tighten restrictions on technology exports to China. PHOTO: WANG ZHAO/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

Tech

Tech Tensions Simmer in Washington as U.S., China Near Trade Truce

par Featured articles licensed from The Wall Street Journal | le 15 January 2020


 

 

 

White House efforts to crack down on technology exports while easing tariffs reflects differing policy views within agencies

By

Bob Davis and
Katy Stech Ferek – The Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON—The U.S. and China are about to declare a pause in their trade war by signing an initial pact this week, but a continuing battle over technology is bound to keep relations between the two superpowers on edge.

The Trump administration’s immediate focus is tightening restrictions on Huawei Technologies Co., the giant Chinese telecommunications company that the White House and Congress view as a national-security threat. The Commerce Department recently sent regulations to the Office of Management and Budget that would largely eliminate a loophole that allowed U.S. companies to sell to Huawei from their overseas facilities, people familiar with the matter said.

Some lawmakers and national-security experts have said Huawei’s equipment would allow Chinese leaders to spy on Americans, which the company has regularly denied. A Huawei spokesman didn’t return a request for comment on the potential restrictions.

China hawks in Congress also have been pushing to limit sales to Huawei, and some are calling for Washington to subsidize U.S. firms working on next-generation 5G wireless technology, given how much Beijing has subsidized Huawei.

At the same time, a team of senior U.S. officials, including deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, lobbied the U.K. earlier this week to block local network operators from using equipment from Huawei and other Chinese vendors in their 5G networks. A British decision is expected shortly.

More broadly, the National Security Council asked the Commerce Department last week to suggest regulations to restrict sales of any U.S. technology to China, according to people tracking the early-stage discussions.

Should all the efforts bear fruit, nearly any technology exports to Huawei in particular, and China in general, would require export licenses. While Commerce could grant such licenses, U.S. companies fear their Chinese customers would turn to other suppliers. In 2018, about 36% of U.S. semiconductor company revenues, or $75 billion, came from sales to China, the Semiconductor Industry Association estimated.

The technology offensive comes as President Trump and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He are scheduled to sign an initial trade pact Wednesday in the White House as broader negotiations continue. The agreement calls for increased Chinese purchases of U.S. goods and services, toughened protection in China of U.S. intellectual property and liberalization of the Chinese financial-services market. In exchange, the U.S. has agreed to halve tariffs on $120 billion of Chinese goods to 7.5% and suspend plans for other tariffs.

The twin efforts—cracking down on technology exports while easing tariffs—represent different factions within the administration that are competing for the president’s attention, government officials said. While there is broad agreement that China’s power should be checked, there is no consensus among or even within various agencies on the best approach.

National security officials also argue the U.S. can push hard on issues like technology, human rights and a Chinese military buildup even as the administration eases off on the trade fight.

Congress, meanwhile, plays a bigger role on export controls than on other trade matters, and some lawmakers take a harsh view of China. In 2018, Congress passed a law requiring the administration to come up with a list of emerging technologies whose sales to China and other countries would be limited.

“Most of the national security types—they could care less about soybeans,” said Chris Krueger, a strategist at Cowen & Co., referring to the “phase-one” deal’s provisions for additional farm goods purchases, a Trump priority.

The battle has also played out in Congress. Last year, 19 lawmakers—11 Republicans and eight Democrats—floated three bills that would make it harder for Commerce officials to remove Huawei from the list. Two bills would have required Congress to vote on the removal. What passed didn’t include that requirement, but some lawmakers have pledged to continue applying pressure.

Separately, a bipartisan group of senators proposed a measure that would steer at least $750 million toward approved firms developing 5G technology and create a separate $500 million fund for companies that deploy “trusted and secure” equipment around the world. Sens. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) and Mark Warner, (D., Va.), who lead the Senate’s intelligence committee, introduced the bill.

It isn’t clear whether Mr. Trump would approve the changes being sought. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who has resisted efforts to use Treasury sanctions to hobble Huawei, could also try to intervene for fear of upsetting overall relations with China, said industry executives who have lobbied him.

On Huawei, there is widespread frustration within the administration that a move in May to place the company on the Commerce Department’s blacklist didn’t have much effect. In late December, Huawei reported that its revenue rose about 18% to a record $122 billion—in part because U.S. companies figured out ways to continue supplying Huawei. Much of what U.S. companies supply the Chinese telecom doesn’t usually require a license.

If chips and other components are produced overseas and contain less than 25% U.S-made content subject to export restrictions, those goods can be shipped license-free to Huawei. Commerce’s proposed rule would reduce that percentage to 10% when it comes to Huawei, people familiar with the discussions said. Items that don’t qualify would require an export license.

The rule’s “interim final” designation allows it to take effect without a formal comment period. The semiconductor industry has lobbied to get that reversed, including meeting with Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross before Christmas, without success.

The rule would take effect once the departments of State, Commerce, Defense and Energy sign on. Industry then could comment, but such appeals rarely have any impact. The U.S. could take to court or sanction any company that breaks the restrictions.

There are divisions within Commerce and Defense over the rule. Some in the Pentagon worry the change would hobble U.S. companies and their ability to innovate. Some Commerce officials have fended off even more stringent changes.

The National Security Council effort is more far-reaching but at a preliminary stage, and its target is China broadly, not just Huawei, the people following the discussions said. NSC officials asked Commerce to consider requiring companies to get export licenses for chips made outside the U.S. that make any use of U.S. technology. That would apply not just to U.S. companies but also to the many instances in which foreign firms’ products incorporate U.S. technology.

Tech industry critics say the Commerce and NSC measures would drive U.S. companies to locate their research and development efforts abroad. But others at the NSC, including Mr. Pottinger, believe U.S. firms must sever relations with Huawei.

He told SIA officials at a meeting in September that they needed to better recognize the threat Huawei posed. U.S. companies must develop “ways to support an ecosystem for telecom infrastructure and IT infrastructure that the free world can trust, instead of saying, ‘We need the China market so badly that we need to deprioritize our national security,’” Mr. Pottinger said later in an interview, explaining his thinking.

The battle has also played out in Congress. Last year, 19 lawmakers—11 Republicans and eight Democrats—floated three bills that would make it harder for Commerce officials to remove Huawei from the list. Two bills would have required Congress to vote on the removal. What passed didn’t include that requirement, but some lawmakers have pledged to continue applying pressure.

Separately, a bipartisan group of senators proposed a measure that would steer at least $750 million toward approved firms developing 5G technology and create a separate $500 million fund for companies that deploy “trusted and secure” equipment around the world. Sens. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) and Mark Warner, (D., Va.), who lead the Senate’s intelligence committee, introduced the bill.